I don?t like Adrien Broner, the person. I have no quarrel with brash, loud-mouthed, uber-confident guys who can back it up in the ring (see: I have no ill will towards Floyd Mayweather, Jr.). However, everything about Broner is annoying. His ?hair brushing? gimmick? His ill-timed, poorly-delivered jokes and misconceived sense of humor? It?s all a hopeless charade in trying to emulate the aforementioned Mayweather. Broner just doesn?t get ?it?.
While Floyd can be rightly criticized for not fighting the best available opponents over the last decade, his in-ring skills and out-of-the ring popularity are unquestionable. He?s the best in the business when considering the combination of fame, recognition, and skill.
While Twitter is not the ultimate measure of a man?s popularity, it?s certainly a good reference point. Floyd has over 4 million followers, but Broner has just 96,000. To be fair, Floyd has been at the top of the sport for a long time, and this is not an apples-apples comparison, but when you hear Broner referred to as ?the future of boxing? or ?the next big thing?, you would expect a bigger fan following. And as someone who openly doesn?t care for Broner, I am still accounted for as one of the 96,000.
What Adrien Broner does have is the single best weapon in all of boxing: His straight right hand. It?s a God-given missile, and it will carry him to great heights as a prizefighter. Make no mistake, Broner is neither flawless nor unbeatable. When he tries to imitate Floyd?s patented shoulder-roll defense, he gets tagged repeatedly for it. Fortunately for his handlers, he can take a punch just fine. His defensive liabilities will absolutely cost him as he continues stepping up in competition. In the meantime, Broner has the great equalizer in his right hand. It?s his trump card, and it?s his bailout. It?s truly amazing how he can generate such power without cocking back, loading up, etc. It?s like a supercharged jab, shot out like a pistol.
Broner constantly draws comparisons to Floyd Mayweather, Jr., and some of the reasons are obvious. The pre-fight antics, the trash talk, and the lightning-fast hand speed in the ring are clear similarities. The most identifiable similarity in their respective fighting styles is their quick right hands. However, there are some clear differences between the two fighters:
Difference 1: The good news for Broner.
Floyd, for years, has won fights with his straight right alone. While inflicting minimal damage, it lands at will, keeps opponents off balance/out of sync, and racks up points. Earlier in Floyd?s career, he would land explosive combinations and land several meaningful punches while his opponent tried to land one. Now, as an aging fighter, Floyd uses his straight right as both a lead and a counter, and it?s nearly indefensible due to his accuracy, timing, and innate ability to know precisely when to throw it.
This is where the difference in their right hand lies. At 135 lbs, Broner?s straight right is ?Nyquil?. It puts people to sleep (well aware that was a tacky reference) with concussive force, and at the very least snaps opponent?s heads back enough to make them think twice about engaging in exchanges. It?s as quick and fast as Floyd?s right hand with a lot more power. And he?s a finisher.
Difference 2: The bad news for Broner.
Adrien Broner doesn?t know how to use his feet (either that, or he is simply lazy/undisciplined). He?s extremely athletic, but he does not really outbox many opponents using his legs/movement. Floyd is the best I?ve ever seen in that regard. He can box circles around people, or lay on the ropes if he?s lazy because he?s that good. He?s never on the ropes because he was forced there. His cerebral approach to boxing makes sure the fight takes place exactly where he wants it to. No matter where the fight goes, Floyd doesn?t take much punishment. Sure, Floyd took shots from Cotto and had his nose bloodied, but he?s 36 and probably losing the world-class reflexes. Broner, who is in his athletic prime on the other hand, gets tagged by some limited offensive fighters since he stands right in front of them. Part of this problem, which can absolutely be corrected, is arrogance. Broner doesn?t think anyone he?s fought can hurt him. So far, he?s been correct. As he moves up in weight, that will undoubtedly change. His defensive complacency will be what separates him from being on top of the sport.
Directly related to lacking proper foot movement, Broner also doesn?t have a good sense of flow between offense and defense like Mayweather. Broner can counter well, but only because his hand speed is typically far superior to his opposition. Conversely, Mayweather lands counters at will because he instinctively transitions between defense and offense fluidly, slipping punches and firing back with his own. Broner simply waits until his opponent is done throwing, and then throws his own punches. It?s the reason Daniel Ponce De Leon was able to stifle Broner?s attack (in spurts) by implementing an awkward, varied fight pace to keep the youngster guessing.
Difference 3: The Moneymaker
While people often watch Floyd fight because they want to see him lose, it?s nothing compared to what Broner makes people feel. I watched his knockout of Gavin Rees with my girlfriend, who admittedly is not a boxing fan. As he made his entrance ? er, train wreck?to the ring, she was so disgusted that all she wanted was ?for that guy to smash his face in.? While it seems like an irrelevant point to the novice fan, that?s not the case. There?s plenty of outstanding boxers right now, and plenty of entertaining ones. But there?s VERY few that have mass appeal. Floyd, for better or worse, has that mass appeal. Broner is genuinely disliked, and that?s a really big deal.
There?s a reason Gennady Golovkin can?t land a Sergio Martinez fight, but Julio Cesar Chavez, Jr. did. It?s the same reason Andre Ward isn?t known by the masses (despite being the best prizefighter on the planet by my estimation). You have to be popular, and you have to appeal to the casual fan/non-fan to sell fights. If a fighter is not marketed well (and in Floyd?s case he largely marketed himself well), they will never reach the pinnacle of the sport. If anything has been made clear over the years, it?s that boxing is a business first and foremost, and if you can?t draw big $$, you can?t draw the exposure/fights needed to become a superstar. I just don?t see Broner doing enough in the ring to overcome his behavior until he matures. Adrien Broner simply cannot carry a network/PPV franchise at this point. What he has working for him is that he?s a pretty exciting fighter to watch (due to his knack for the finish, and suspect defense) and time is on his side.
As far as Broner?s behavior, I know it?s a charade. I do. I also know he?s a kid in a young adult?s body, but that doesn?t excuse his complete lack of class. I hope he has a long, successful career, but I hope he learns some lessons that only can be learned out of the ring.
In the meantime, he?ll be stepping up in weight (two classes to welterweight) to challenge Paulie Malignaggi on Saturday, a move signaling his desire to get involved with the biggest $$ fights in the most competitive division in boxing (and also lay the foundation for a potential ?passing of the torch? fight vs. Mayweather in a few years).The biggest question when guys move up in weight is how they?ll deal with bigger power/punchers, but Malignaggi poses no real threat with his power. What Malignaggi brings to the table is heart, determination, slick boxing knowhow, and experience.
(Revisit his loss to Miguel Cotto here where he battled through extreme punishment and adversity to make it a close fight against an elite fighter)
