I don?t know about you, fellas, but to me, Pacquiao won, period.
Pacquiao failed to knock out Marquez as we had all expected. But that did not detract from the fact he emerged the clear winner.
Even the scorecards alone showed Pacquiao won it: Two judges (Dave Moretti and Glenn
Trowbridge) going for him, the third and last judge (Robert Hoyle) seeing it a draw.
Where?s the doubt there?
You got two of the three judges and you still remained a doubtful winner?
What?s a majority decision but a simple plurality of votes?
The third judge didn?t even rule it a loss for Pacquiao?and you tag Pacquiao a doubtful winner?
C?mon, let?s get real, fellas.
The mere fact that Marquez failed to earn even a single nod from the three judges should be enough proof that Pacquiao had won it loud and clear.
Thank God, Pacquiao isn?t a humbug yet again.
When he was deprived of victory in a 2004 draw result against Marquez after having dropped the Mexican three times in the first round, you never heard Pacquiao complain.
This, even after one of the judges had openly admitted his having entered a wrong score in Round 1 which had cost Pacquiao the victory.
It should have been a 3-0, win-loss tally by now for Pacquiao against Marquez, counting Pacquiao?s split decision win in 2008.
